It is not sound judicial policy to await the final resolution of a criminal case before a complaint against a lawyer may be acted upon

"x x x.

In Bengco v. Bernardo,34 we ruled that it is not sound judicial policy to await the final resolution of a criminal case before a complaint against a lawyer may be acted upon; otherwise, this Court will be rendered helpless to apply the rules on admission to, and continuing membership in the legal profession during the whole period that the criminal case is pending final disposition, when the objectives of the two proceedings are vastly disparate. Disciplinary proceedings involve no private interest and afford no redress for private grievance. They are undertaken and prosecuted solely for the public welfare and to· save courts of justice from persons unfit to practice law. The attorney is called to answer to the court for his conduct as an officer of the court.

x x x."

See - 

http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/2016/february2016/RTJ-13-2361.pdf

(Supreme Court)