CONRADO N. QUE vs. ATTY. ANASTACIO E. REVILLA,
JR., A.C. No.7054, November 11, 2014
“x x x.
Additionally, disbarment is merited because this is not the
respondent’s first ethical infraction of the same nature. We penalized him in
Plus Builders, Inc. and Edgardo Garcia versus Atty. Anastacio E. Revilla for
his willful and intentional falsehood before the court; for misuse of court
procedures and processes to delay the execution of a judgment; and for
collaborating with non-lawyers in the illegal practice of law. We showed
leniency then by reducing his penalty to suspension for six (6) months. We
cannot similarly treat the respondent this time; it is clear that he did not
learn any lesson from his past experience and since then has exhibited traits
of incorrigibility. It is time to put a finis to the respondent’s professional
legal career for the sake of the public, the profession and the interest of
justice.
X x x.”
